On May 27, 2025, National Public Radio (NPR) and three Colorado-based public radio stations—Aspen Public Radio, Colorado Public Radio, and KSUT Public Radio—filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration. The suit challenges Executive Order 14290, signed by President Donald Trump on May 1, which directs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and all federal agencies to cease funding for NPR and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
Grounds for the Lawsuit
The plaintiffs argue that the executive order violates the First Amendment by retaliating against protected speech and constitutes viewpoint-based discrimination. They contend that the order aims to punish NPR for content the president finds objectionable, thereby chilling free expression. Additionally, the lawsuit asserts that the order infringes upon the separation of powers by usurping Congress's authority over federal appropriations.
Legal Representation
NPR has enlisted prominent attorneys, including Miguel Estrada, a former Republican nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals, and Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., known for representing CNN in a previous lawsuit against the Trump administration. Their involvement underscores the seriousness of the constitutional issues at stake.
White House Response
The Trump administration defends the executive order by claiming that the CPB is using taxpayer funds to support a political agenda, thereby justifying the funding cuts. A White House spokesperson stated that the president is exercising his lawful authority to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
Broader Context
This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of confrontations between the Trump administration and public media organizations. Earlier in April, the CPB filed a separate lawsuit challenging the administration's attempt to remove three of its board members, arguing that such actions violate the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967.
The outcome of NPR's lawsuit could have significant implications for the future of public broadcasting in the United States, particularly concerning issues of editorial independence and the constitutional balance of powers.